deviantART: by:chri01 http://search.deviantart.com/?q=by:chri01&section=today deviantART RSS for by:chri01 en-us Copyright 2009, deviantART.com Sun, 20 Dec 2009 11:32:47 PST deviantART.com http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss http://s.deviantart.com/minish/widgets/apple-touch-icon-precomposed.png gone too soon http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/25558499/ http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/25558499/ Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:35:56 PDT
Love you Mike, forever... :heart:





--------------------------------------------------

Oh My Gawwd !!!!
Just listen to his voice and just ... collapse :heart: !!!!

[link]
and
[link]

--------------------------------------------------






:iconmj-4eva: :iconmichael-jackson-club: :iconmajic-mjj: :iconmjdeviantclub:

here is a tribute to MJ where you could post whatever drawing about him...
[link]



]]> ~chri01 Free commissions running http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/17876516/ http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/17876516/ Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:08:06 PDT this is me !!!

And this is a gift from [link] !!


Cherigirl


:iconcherigirl:

girl caricature 1 : [link]
girl caricature 2 : [link]
girl caricature 3 : [link]

(I just love the 3rd one, it's me :)


Member of Clubs


:iconpwfa: :icondapride: :iconparisiens: :iconvegeta-the-sexgod: :iconss4club: :iconvegeta-club: :iconplanet-vegeta-club: :iconprince-and-uke: :icondragonball-z-fans: :iconcolor-me-club:


Free Commissions


Still doing these free commissions, as usual, depending on the time I have ...
My commission policy is very simple actually. Just ask what you want, and I say if I can do it. Then I do it. Maybe I say yes and it turn out I suck... but for anything, feel free to ask.



Recent done commissions
for :iconstephenrsjr: - Freaja >> [link]

for :iconwanderneko: - he as a girl having sex with a boy >> [link]

for :iconelmsdor: - 2 elves >> [link]

for http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/11467824/ Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:47:13 PST

Cherigirl


 :iconcherigirl:
girl caricature 1 : [link]
girl caricature 2 : [link]
girl caricature 3 : [link]
(I just love the 3rd one, it's me :)


Search for inkers or colorists


I really enjoy doing these free commissions, but I'm slow as hell (and in my opinion, very bad) colorist. If you want to color some of my drawings, I can provide a inked (digitaly on PS) version.
If you ink as well, that would be fine too.
I'd love to see other people'w work on my lines.

Free Commissions


Whoah... I really enjoy doing these commissions, I often feel a lack of inspiration by myself, and this is just what I needed... I have much stuff on the fire, so ... be patient.
At least, I draw quite fast with the pen, the color versions are not my best part... doh !

My commission policy is very simple actually. Just ask what you want, and I say if I can do it. Then I do it. Maybe I say yes and it turn out I suck... but for anything, feel free to ask.
I love to make what can be called "art trade too, that's nice :)

Cheers


Waiting commissions (nothing done... dude)
for :iconreal-shadowartist: - Jun Li and Devin
for :iconmatomouro: - a curly redhead playing ... whatever
for :iconspookeriffic: - Strawberry Poundcake
for :iconeclairduverite: - Redhead Eclair
for :iconwitchqueenliz: - Witch queen
for :iconelmsdor: - 2 elves



Done commissions (pen and color)
for :iconborn2run97:
for :iconlathrion: for :icondarkmasterundertaker: ~chri01 girlz and boyz http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/10484638/ http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/10484638/ Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:52:48 PST let me be a bee boy


Open to any Collab... if you ever like my work, don't hesitate

Open to requests too, any kind of inspiration as well :)
Cheers


Current work



- herself

sketch : color sketch :


- a girl with blue hair

sketch :



- gift about Roxane the pirate-girl

sketch : line : color :



Member of Clubs





style design katat0nik ]]> ~chri01 Indeed ! http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/5719621/ http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/5719621/ Wed, 22 Jun 2005 01:09:03 PDT
:heepee:
:) ]]> ~chri01 Some few facts about Jackson's accusers http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/4259490/ http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/4259490/ Fri, 07 Jan 2005 04:45:28 PST
[b]One little example: the reason why the accusing family can’t seem to remember hard dates of this alleged threatening, kidnapping and molestation is because Jackson’s people kept them away from “clocks and dates”. They claim there were no calendars or clocks anywhere at Neverland. How convenient for them….especially considering that Jackson has a huge-ass clock built into the landscape of his Neverland ranch! Not to mention one can get a cheap watch from Wal-mart for under $7.00. What? They weren’t kidnapped and taken to Wal-mart? Just expensive stores and hotels?

Not to mention the fact that there are 3rd -party witnesses who were at Jackson’s Neverland ranch during the prosecution’s timeline who saw this family there, conversing with people and walking around Neverland like everything was just fine. Two of those witnesses are reporters by the way. I guess it didn’t cross their minds to ask any one of them for the date or time? Yeah right. [/b]

[link] ]]> ~chri01 Reminder http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/4141894/ http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/4141894/ Fri, 24 Dec 2004 02:21:25 PST [link]

It is also important, once again, to understand what the accusing family’s and prosecution’s story is.

Prosecutors are claiming that Jackson conspired to kidnap, then kidnapped a family of 4—after already knowing them for years—and holding them at the wide-open Neverland Ranch. Then, they claim Jackson molested the accuser. Then they claim he conspired some more.

And this was supposedly all done right in the middle of at least 2 independent investigations into these very allegations. Not to mention the media’s white-hot spotlight being focused on this kid and this family, the family being caught on tape numerous times talking about what a wonderful person Jackson is, and signing sworn affidavits in connection with these independent investigations sparked by so-called “concerned citizens”.

[link] ]]> ~chri01 Jackson Prosecution Split? http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/4007619/ http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/4007619/ Mon, 06 Dec 2004 23:21:13 PST Citizens -- and potential jury pool members -- in Santa Barbara, California, are scratching their heads over Friday’s 11th hour raid on pop star Michael Jackson’s ranch, and "CJ" has discovered the search may signal a division in the ranks of his molestation case’s prosecution.

"CJ" talked to Santa Barbara florist Maurice Sourmany, who says he was in the Junior Chamber of Commerce with District Attorney Tom Sneddon. "I don’t want to judge Tom Sneddon because he’s a personal friend of mine," Sourmany told us. "But by the same token, people are starting to talk."

Sourmany said he wonders why his old buddy waited until such a late date to put a cotton swab in Michael Jackson’s mouth to get a DNA sample from the superstar. "Why now? Why so late in the game?" Sourmany asked. "These are things I thought he should have done a long time ago."

Meanwhile, in a rare moment, Jackson prosecutor Gerald Franklin spoke to us outside the DA’s office. While he stressed that the gag order prevented him from discussing details, sources are privately pointing to a possible rift within the DA’s office, with one faction saying they are ready for a January 31st trial, while others insist the last-minute raid shows they need to buy more time to get the case ready.

We also spoke with defense attorney Robert Sanger, who was similarly mum, but sources tell us that the defense might not ask for a delay -- precisely because they sense the DA might not be ready, even as both sides hit the Monday deadline to turn over discovery to the other side.

"What will be, will be," Franklin said to us, regarding discovery. "I don’t have any expectations. I imagine there will be the odd document."

In terms of strategy, the defense is now reportedly expected to attack Jackson’s accuser’s mother. Published reports say the defense will likely question that the mother appropriately used money raised at The Laugh Factory in 2000 by comedians like Chris Tucker and George Lopez; the funds were earmarked for the accuser’s medical expenses since the boy had cancer at the time. A source close to the Los Angeles comedy club told us he thinks the money went to the accuser's father, but the dad's attorney scoffed at that claim, saying he's never heard of any money from any fundraiser going to his client.

Source: [link] ]]> ~chri01 Documents Show Jackson Accusers Unreliable http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/3961248/ http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/3961248/ Wed, 01 Dec 2004 02:03:56 PST
More information has come to light which may cast further doubt over the charges filed against Jackson, indicating the mother had previously used a similar method for financial gain. However, prosecutors have repeatedly denied the family is after money.

During a pre-trial hearing yesterday, Judge Rodney Melville granted a defense request to subpoena psychological, financial, medical and military records relating to the accuser’s family.

The judge also denied a defense request to conduct psychological examinations of the family. Senior Deputy District Attorney Ron Zonen objected to the widening scope of defense subpoenas, labeling these as "undue invasion of privacy, confidentiality and privilege."

Judge Melville, however, said that the prosecution did not represent the family and could not ask that any documents remained confidential.

The documents sought by Mr. Jackson are believed to include psychiatric reports from a civil suit previously filed by the accuser’s mother - against retailer J.C. Penney.

The suit was filed after her son was detained for allegedly shoplifting in 1998. Following charges being laid against her son, she filed a $3 million countersuit, claiming a security guard at the store attacked her and her children and also sexually molested her. The company dropped the shoplifting charges and paid the family $137,000.

The psychiatric reports in question, now obtained by a number of news organizations, were compiled in 2001 by Dr. John Hochman, an assistant clinical professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Neurology at UCLA.

The reports describe the mother as delusional and draw the conclusion that she may have fabricated the allegations of abuse. Dr. Hochman, quoting the mother, said that following the J.C. Penney incident she “saw a gynecologist due to irregularities in her menstruating and she was this way because her body was traumatized and ´every hormone in her body was being released.´ There is no evidence confirming [the mother´s] testimony she had to get her hormones straightened out due to the mall episode."

Amongst other records, the defense has requested gynecological records, thought to be from this incident. An attorney for the family filed an objection to the release of medical records. It is not clear if these are the records referred to.

Following the J.C. Penney incident, the family complained of headaches and nightmares. The children were scared that "the bad people from J.C. Penney’s” would hurt them, said Dr. Hochman.

He also noted that the mother frequently claimed memory loss about her life prior to the incident. "She said she didn´t want to remember anything about her prior psychiatric treatment. She didn´t remember where (her son) took dancing lessons.”

Dr. Hochman also reported "she was far more upset talking about the mall episode than about her son´s bout with cancer. Her general demeanor alternated between a blunted state and tearful hysteria."

The boy also indicated that the incident was “more frightening” than his battle with cancer, while his brother described it as “worse.”

The doctor stated that he thought the interviews with the children were rehearsed and pointed out "doubtful aspects" of their testimony, saying it was “impossible” for the whole family to have "identical stories years later."

Following the incident, police and a doctor stated that they saw no injuries and were not told of any sexual molestation - those charges were added two years later.

Dr. Hochman said the mother insisted that "prior to the mall incident she was living an ideal and extraordinarily virtuous life,"

The grand jury process is also expected to suffer an attack from Jackson’s defense team who have claimed the proceedings were flawed and biased.

Granting a defense request, Judge Melville ordered that transcripts of the grand jury selection process as well as written communication between grand jurors and prosecutors be handed to the defense.

Also subpoenaed were materials used by the county jury commissioner to select the jurors. The jury selection process is currently under review by the California Supreme Court.

Source: SBNews-Press/AP/MJJForum ]]> ~chri01 Documents Could End Jackson Conspiracy Charges http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/3846410/ http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/3846410/ Tue, 16 Nov 2004 01:55:32 PST by Dr. K. C. Arceneaux
November 13, 2004

The release of redacted documents, on November 12, 2004, that are among the evidence in the child molestation case against Michael Jackson could collapse the case, or at the very least, cast serious doubt on the conspiracy charges against him. The documents include correspondence between then Jackson attorney Mark Geragos and William Dickerman, attorney for "Jane Doe," the mother of Jackson´s accuser. The letters were sent immediately following the period during which Ms. Doe said she was imprisoned by Jackson employees and was fearful for her life. However, the letters are very mundane, if combative, and concern the return of household belongings. There is no mention of events remotely resembling the accusations made in the Grand Jury indictment.

The letters reveal a prolonged and acrimonious exchange between the attorneys, beginning on March 26 and ending on May 17, 2003. The letters concern return of items that had been removed from Ms. Doe´s home and placed in storage. In the letters, there is squabbling about when and where to deliver the belongings, and concern about who would make payments on a storage facility. And yet, this exchange occurs immediately after the period that Ms. Doe claims she and her children were falsely imprisoned by Jackson´s staff. The question here is simple. If Ms. Doe thought she and her children had been imprisoned and her life threatened, as she later claimed, why did she not tell Dickerman, her attorney? Kidnapping is a much more serious issue than who will pay for the storage of furniture.

Ms. Doe´s accusations against Jackson are similar to charges she made against her now-ex husband in a divorce dispute. About the Jackson case, Ms. Doe said in a police interview leaked to the media in September, 2004, that she felt that "Somebody was going to kill the kids and me. Mostly the kids." In the divorce dispute, she accused her husband of molesting their daughter, kidnapping, and threatening her life. In judge´s chambers, the daughter recanted statements she had made earlier, and said that the father did not make death threats. Russell Halpern, attorney for the boy´s father, said that he believes the mother scripted her children. Halpern said the father once showed him a script his wife had allegedly written for their children to use when they were questioned in a civil deposition. "She wrote out all their testimony. I actually saw the script. I remember my client showing me, bringing the paperwork to me."

The charges against Michael Jackson are not the first time Ms.Doe has leveled charges of sexual abuse against someone. It is the third. In addition to the charges made against her husband, Ms. Doe also accused security guards of sexually abusing her by fondling her breasts and crotch in a parking lot. The guards had followed her son and husband from the store and accused them of shoplifting. The boy reportedly was carrying a stack of unpaid-for clothing. Ms. Doe alleged that the abuse went on for seven minutes, as her family apparently looked on helplessly. As in the Jackson case, there was a memory delay before accusations were made. Ms. Doe remembered two years after the parking lot incident that she had been (allegedly) sexually abused; these accusations were added to her three million dollar civil case against J.C. Penney.

Tom Griffen, Penney´s attorney, said in an interview by Mike Taibbi on the Abrams Report, March 4, 2004,"It became readily apparent that this was an incident, in my opinion, a scam to extract money from J. C. Penney." The case was settled out of court, for a reported $137,000. According to Griffen, the settlement was to avoid the risk of losing in a jury trial. One also assumes that the negative publicity would not have been desirable for the company. The psychiatrist retained by Penney to examine Ms. Doe said that he felt she scripted her children´s stories to match hers.

Veracity seems to be a serious problem with this family. In the first indictment Jackson was charged with seven counts of child molestation. In the second indictment, by a grand jury presided over by Santa Barbara prosecutor Tom Sneddon, the instances of molestation had declined from seven to three, with one alleged molestation attempt. Where did the other three molestations go? Did the boy in question, now a mature teenager, testify to seven instances of molestation and then remember that three of them did not happen? Or, now that he is older and wiser, is he less cooperative? Inexplicably, the grand jury indictment added charges not present in the first indictment. Jackson now has been accused of conspiracy to commit twenty-eight felony acts, including conspiring t... ]]> ~chri01 BREAKING NEWS : Sneddon Allowed Feldman to Lie to http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/3757006/ http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/3757006/ Thu, 04 Nov 2004 23:40:11 PST > [link]



In a report from the AP discussing what was brought out in court today, Jackson's lawyers revealed that civil attorney Larry Feldman essentially lied to grand jurors about the prospects of the accusing family.

They say Feldman told grand jurors, after being called by prosecutors to testify, that if the family pressed forward with a criminal case it diminished their chances of winning a civil suit. This, of course, is a complete lie. If they push ahead with the criminal case to convict Jackson, it all but ensures that they'll received a civil judgement at the end of it. That is, if they lie well enough on the stand.

Here's an excerpt from the report:

AP: Linda Deutsch
Title: Judge refuses to remove Michael Jackson prosecutor from case (Nov 4 2004) - AP

...

Jackson's lawyer, Thomas Mesereau Jr., had presented a final exhortation in favor of removing Sneddon, saying that the district attorney and his office had spent more money pursuing Jackson than they had on the cases of serial killers, showing that they had lost perspective.

Mesereau said that Sneddon was so personally invested in pursuing Jackson's case that he misrepresented to grand jurors the potential motivation of a boy's family in accusing Jackson.

Mesereau said that Sneddon brought an attorney, Larry Feldman, before the grand jury and had him tell the panelists that a criminal prosecution of Jackson would diminish the chances for the boy's family to win compensation in a civil suit against the pop singer.

In truth, Mesereau said, a criminal conviction would mean that the family would be more likely to win a financial claim against Jackson.

"It goes without saying that if you obtain a criminal conviction, that will establish liability," Mesereau said. "Every lawyer here knows that if Mr. Jackson was convicted of these allegations, the alleged victims could walk into civil court and get a judgment."

He also cited Sneddon's personal role in investigating the Jackson case as well as his performance at a press conference announcing the singer's arrest.

But he said the entire district attorney's office was too zealous in the grand jury proceedings.

"They are too emotionally invested in getting a case against the celebrity.... They are blinded by zeal, blinded by emotion in deciding how to decide this case."

The judge expressed interest in one point raised by Mesereau that Sneddon might have to be a witness in the trial because of his personal role in investigating Jackson.

>> [link] ]]> ~chri01 Absurd Excuses in Effort to Retain Jackson Prosecu http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/3713164/ http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/3713164/ Sun, 31 Oct 2004 02:13:26 PST [link]

Then out comes this gem of an admission: “Defendant does not have a constitutional right to a District Attorney who likes him, nor one who is indifferent about prosecuting him successfully” (pg 10).

I highly doubt Jackson gives a flying flip about whether or not Sneddon “likes” him. That is not the issue. The issue is that Jackson IS entitled to a prosecutor who looks at evidence, or lack thereof, and takes into account EVERYTHING; not just the information he “likes”.

Jackson IS entitled to a prosecutor who furthers a “case” based on evidence, not based on his sheer desire for a conviction so much so that they keep fishing—100+ search warrants and all—hoping to find something…anything.

Jackson IS entitled to a prosecutor(s) that doesn’t break attorney-client privilege or tramples on the rights of the accused. It is his right, whether prosecutors like it or not, to have a prosecutor who isn’t involved in massive misconduct during the grand jury process.

Jackson IS entitled to a prosecutor(s) who isn’t a witness in this “case”, who has not injected himself into this “case” by an insane desire to convict him…not matter what.

It IS his right to a prosecutor(s) who isn’t trying to railroad him or convict him in the court of public opinion with the help of the DA’s crisis management firm.

Jackson IS entitled to have a prosecutor(s) who follow the freakin’ law, whether is hurts their case or not. Period.

But these prosecutors seem to be assuming Jackson wants someone to play tiddlywinks with him in the courtroom. Please.

It is disgustingly ridiculous to claim that the reason the defense wants Sneddon & co. yanked from prosecuting the “case” is because Jackson wants someone who “likes” him. But then again, some aren’t surprised by these types of arguments from prosecutors which seem more based on “Ms. Cleo”-like speculation than on real facts.

The audacity with which they claim to have had “substantial evidence” during the 1993 investigation, yet brought no case against Jackson is eye-rolling to say the least. Now they claim to have “substantial evidence” in this “case”, yet can’t seem to logically explain how the accusing family vindicated Jackson repeatedly while not at Neverland and without one Jackson employee in sight.

In fact, some observers speculate that the only thing that held these people hostage was Jackson’s open-tab: the credit cards, shopping sprees, free trips, etc., etc., etc.

Maybe prosecutors think they shouldn’t be held hostage to the law…or the truth…or the facts…or the evidence…or the…well you get the picture.

Stay tuned.

-MJEOL
[link] ]]> ~chri01 Outrageous Response from Prosecutors as they try t http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/3677295/ http://chri01.deviantart.com/journal/3677295/ Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:40:10 PDT [link]

Just when you thought prosecutors in the Michael Jackson “case” may be starting to get some sense about the massive inconsistencies in their story, they file a motion like their reply to the defense’s motion to have them tossed from prosecuting Jackson. If anything, the Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Recuse the District Attorney is more proof of why they should be yanked.

Tom Sneddon, the current DA of Santa Barbara, has already become a witness in this “case”. He will probably be made to testify at a possible trial as well; as he has already been made to testify at a pre-trial hearing. That alone, and the behavior which created the situation, should be reason enough to have him and his office tossed.

Even in the face of this devastating fact, prosecutors had the gall to claim that the defense “can’t point to a factual circumstance extrinsic to the prosecutor” which concerns a conflict of interest. Better be careful what they wish for because Sneddon’s past may come back to haunt this “case”. Some say they believe that there may be “extrinsic” attitudes and behavior that would cast a shadow on this prosecution. But let me say it again: the freakin’ DA is a witness in the ‘case’. It shouldn’t get past that fact.

For those who think DA’s never get recused, Sneddon’s office was just yanked from prosecuting the case against Judge Diana Hall last month (September 2004) for a conflict of interest (see DA Recused, Hall to Testify in Dunlap Misconduct Case and State decides to prosecute Judge Hall ).

[link] ]]> ~chri01