http://search.deviantart.com/?q=by:killedface&section=today deviantART RSS for by:killedface en-us Copyright 2009, deviantART.com Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:18:56 PST deviantART.com http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss http://s.deviantart.com/minish/widgets/apple-touch-icon-precomposed.png http://killedface.deviantart.com/journal/17280026/ http://killedface.deviantart.com/journal/17280026/ Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:33:19 PDT -Churchill

lol

]]> ~killedface http://killedface.deviantart.com/journal/16269361/ http://killedface.deviantart.com/journal/16269361/ Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:34:34 PST China, the country with the world's largerst population, amounting to about one out of every five living humans, was, by 1949, officially a communist nation-the "People's Republic." The individual whose personal example and teachings would dominate the masses of China in the succeeding decades was Mao Tse-tung (1893 - 1976).

All reactionaries are paper tigers. In appearance, the reactionaries are terrifying, but in reality they are not so powerful. From a long-term point of view, it is not the reactionaries but the people who are really powerful.

I have said that all the reputedly powerful reactionaries are merely paper tigers. The reason is that they are divorced from the people. Look! Was not Hitler a paper tiger? Was Hitler not overthrown? I also said that the tsar of Russia, the emperor of China and Japanese imperialism were all paper tigers. As we know, they were all overthrown. U.S. imperialism has not yet been overthrown and it has the atom bomb. I believe it also will be overthrow. It, too is a paper tiger.

The atom bomb is a paper tiger witch the U.S. reactionaries use to scare people. It looks terrible, but in fact it isn't. Of course, the atom bomb is a weapon of mass slaughter, but the outcome of a war is decided by the people, not by one or two new types of weapons.


60 years later


_{The American Empire invades Afghanistan and Iraq, over extends NATO encroaching on Russia, and adopts Japan as a vassel state. The prospect of nuclear war edges ever closer to the eastern sun set.}

]]> ~killedface http://killedface.deviantart.com/journal/16084226/ http://killedface.deviantart.com/journal/16084226/ Mon, 24 Dec 2007 20:53:18 PST
[link]

]]> ~killedface http://killedface.deviantart.com/journal/15693110/ http://killedface.deviantart.com/journal/15693110/ Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:42:16 PST
youtube.com/watch?v=8bQgFM3bNyw

Suppose the meaning of life might just be an abstraction from any real merit or substance to the actual question of existence and relation to the physical world. Possibly the over simplification of a generic process running the mind at all *conscious* times. The same process that might say that your hungry and that you need food, or that you want to be happy, the processes of interaction and the dealing with problems by the mind. It's like a system of redundancy in a line of code or in a logic pattern running the same checks over and over and over and over again. Checking for the creation and alteration of variables, inherently those variables being the meaning of life. Thus it's abstraction being a single question like, "Is the meaning of life to be happy?" Whilst the answer and the question are both hypothetical the literal interpretation is that of a system running checks on behavioral, conditional, and plausible outcomes to a scenario that could never play out considering the absurdity of the fundamental reasoning. Is there a meaning to live? yes, and we're asking ourselves what it is ever step in the sequence, ever run through the index, ever moment of every waking day our minds facilitate us.

Believe I've lost mine, dun't know what I did with it. Do you have it? *checks freezer* Ok, now why would it be in the freezer, I know it wasn't in the freezer. I once lost my keys and got so frustrated that I checked everywhere around the house, high and low, in the trash can, in my pockets about a billion times hoping they'd just re-appear there, and even in the freezer. Knowing of course that they weren't in there. *opens freezer again* But where is it! Where's my mind?






*opens freezer again*

]]> ~killedface http://killedface.deviantart.com/journal/14588197/ http://killedface.deviantart.com/journal/14588197/ Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:53:44 PDT
Lemurs Rule
this Lemur is... like yeah man, it's the awesome. Click on it, click on it twice. Fucking Lemurs taking tokes off a cigarette man, OHMYGAWD?! fucking rules, yes. This picture rules. SHEEEEEEEEIIIIIIITTTTTTT


For forty or fifty years past, Mr. H. G. Wells and others have been warning us that man is in danger of destroying himself with his own weapons, leaving the ants or some other gregarious species to take over. Anyone who has seen the ruined cities of Germany will find this notion at least thinkable. Nevertheless, looking at the world as a whole, the drift for many decades has been not towards anarchy but towards the reimposition of slavery. We may be heading not for general breakdown but for an epoch as horribly stable as the slave empires of antiquity. James Burnham's theory has been much discussed, but few people have yet considered its ideological implications — that is, the kind of world-view, the kind of beliefs, and the social structure that would probably prevail in a state which was at once unconquerable and in a permanent state of ‘cold war’ with its neighbors.

Had the atomic bomb turned out to be something as cheap and easily manufactured as a bicycle or an alarm clock, it might well have plunged us back into barbarism, but it might, on the other hand, have meant the end of national sovereignty and of the highly-centralised police state. If, as seems to be the case, it is a rare and costly object as difficult to produce as a battleship, it is likelier to put an end to large-scale wars at the cost of prolonging indefinitely a "peace that is no peace". [link]

admins keep me save from all those people ^_^ i love admins, we all love admins. Let's all sing a song about how... ]]> ~killedface http://killedface.deviantart.com/journal/14557977/ http://killedface.deviantart.com/journal/14557977/ Sun, 09 Sep 2007 09:01:16 PDT people who get tagged must write in their journals about 6 weird habits/facts/dislikes as well as state this rule clearly.
=========

i've been tagged and by some law (surely) im obligated to respond in a timely manner. so im'a wright some stuffs kekeke

1. (weird stuff)- I day dream way way too much. No joke I waste so much of my day just sitting and staring into sky trying to rationalize irrational things like the difference between an infinite and a finite _{(if any)}.

2. (habit)- I convey music as a form of meditation and an outlet for human experience thus any censorship of or about it's presence in any tangible form is an attempt to control thought. Of course the modern interpretation of music that is funneled down from the corporate executives to Mtv is as synonymous with censorship as suppression. Although as the latter category would discourage we still have generations of music worth listening to and I habitually wake myself up with a good album.

3. (dislike)- Gross consumerism. I find the ego trips we take to Walmart_tm as the cornerstone of the digression from human affection, vehemence, despondency, ecstasy, sympathy, perturbation, or any other way we might use words to describe the various sensations that have so affectionately been branded emotions and pushed back into our minds when felt at anytime inappropriate. It feels like were being conditioned on a large scale in a subtle cold efficient manner, conditioned to be as passively accepting as possible. There is so little passion any more, so so little passion, even in what people expect love to be :/

4. (dislike)- _war

5. (weird habit)- I try to relate everything that happens to me or that I witness in terms of anthropology. That is to say that I try to understand it even though I've often found it difficult if not beyond my capacity.

6. (fact)- Sometimes I wanna get a whole bunch of people together and jump off a bridge just to prove a point. The most shocking thing would be the cold water at the bottom. Since most people build bridges across streams I don't see the negative connotation usually associated with the idea. On one hand if everybody jumped off a bridge would I do it too, yeah sounds like fun, on the other, for what point why not? In isolation there wouldn't ever have been a bridge that burned in such a frail farewell, but to the masses.

TAG


: P



go look at Laurens page if'ya get a minute or three

]]> ~killedface http://killedface.deviantart.com/journal/12755494/ http://killedface.deviantart.com/journal/12755494/ Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:04:21 PDT _+JD0_______________++JD______
_++JD______________+JD0_______
_++JD_____________++JD________
__+JD0___________++JD8_________
__+JD8_________++JD0__________
__++JD0_______++JD0___________
__++JD8_____+++JD0____________
__++JDJD__+++JDJD++88_________
__+++JDJD+++JDJD++JDJD________
___++888JD8888JD++8JDJD8+80____
___++88++8888++8888888++888___
___++++++JDJDJDJDJDJDJDJDJD8___
____++++++JDJDJDJDJDJDJDJD8___
____++++++++000JDJDJDJDJDJD___
_____+++++++0000JDJDJDJDJDJD___
______+++++++000JDJDJDJDJD8___
_______+++++++0JDJDJDJDJD8____
_______+++++++0JDJDJDJDJD8____
________+++++++JDJDJDJDJD_____
________+++++++00JDJDJDJD_____
________++++++00JDJDJDJD______


[link]

]]> ~killedface