<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">
    <channel>
        <title>deviantART: by:shinyhappygoth</title>
        <link>http://search.deviantart.com/?q=by:shinyhappygoth&amp;section=today</link>
        <description>deviantART RSS for by:shinyhappygoth</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2009, deviantART.com</copyright>

        <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:21:22 PST</pubDate>        
        <generator>deviantART.com</generator>
        <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
        <atom:icon>http://s.deviantart.com/minish/widgets/apple-touch-icon-precomposed.png</atom:icon>
        <atom:link href="http://backend.deviantart.com/rss.xml?q=by%3Ashinyhappygoth&amp;type=journal" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
                  <item>
                <title>Accidental plagarism is STILL PLAGARISM.</title>
                <link>http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/journal/27219400/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/journal/27219400/</guid>
                <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:49:26 PDT</pubDate>
                
                <description><![CDATA[ My Danny Phantom vector fanart, also posted on my <a href="http://www.deviantart.com/users/outgoing?http://purplemagpie.0catch.com/art/">portfolio</a>:<br /><a href="http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/art/Dani-Phantom-adult-67364475">[link]</a><br /><a href="http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/art/Tucker-Foley-adult-67741038">[link]</a><br /><br />Barely-qualifies-as-fanart that I have run across recently:<br /><a href="http://heromaster85.deviantart.com/art/team-phantom-135670697">[link]</a><br /><a href="http://thegangster2468.deviantart.com/art/Dani-Phantom-Gains-Some-Weight-137064730">[link]</a><br /><br />News flash, people: Just because it turns up in a Google image search does NOT mean it's free for the taking.  If you think my pictures are official show material, I'm flattered, but guess what?  Image searches SHOW YOU WHERE THE IMAGE CAME FROM.  The source page OCCUPIES MOST OF YOUR SCREEN.  If it's someone's art portfolio, they probably don't want you using it without their permission!<br /><br />The first transgression has been resolved by the addition of credit and links, but, based on the perpetrator's professed cluelessness, I expect to see more of this.  Gods, somebody fetch me a cluebat.<br /><br /><br /><strong>ETA:</strong> The second offending pic is gone.  I <em>hope</em> that means the artist took it down of their own accord, but since they never responded to my complaint, it's hard to say.<br /><br /> ]]></description>
                <author>~shinyhappygoth</author>
            </item>
          <item>
                <title>Finals are over!  Woot!</title>
                <link>http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/journal/4048355/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/journal/4048355/</guid>
                <pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2004 08:50:11 PST</pubDate>
                
                <description><![CDATA[ Last night my Live Video class had our  final performance.  It went pretty well  and was fun and there were a couple of  quite nice three-year-old girls there  for me to corrupt as well as a  super-friendly pit bull puppy with <i>lots</i>  of kisses to share.  There was a decent  crowd for the performance.  We finished  packing up the equipment at nigh on 1  in the morning.  Then the professors  bought us beer. ]]></description>
                <author>~shinyhappygoth</author>
            </item>
          <item>
                <title>out-of-character comments</title>
                <link>http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/journal/3736307/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/journal/3736307/</guid>
                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2004 17:42:03 PST</pubDate>
                
                <description><![CDATA[ So last Saturday week, I was out with ~<a href="http://mitya.deviantart.com/"> mitya</a>, a friend of hers, and said  friend's visiting boyfriend.  And as we  were pulling into the Blockbuster  parking lot, we saw pulling out a Lexus  SUV.  And everyone was gaping at this  extraordinary waste of money, and then  I said, to the frank astonishment of  all present (including myself), "Hey,  mister, how small is <i>your</i> penis?"<br />
<br />
I have my moments. ]]></description>
                <author>~shinyhappygoth</author>
            </item>
          <item>
                <title>my latest mental effluvium</title>
                <link>http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/journal/3013396/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/journal/3013396/</guid>
                <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2004 10:57:27 PDT</pubDate>
                
                <description><![CDATA[ So I just got the CD of the Shrek 1  score (not soundtrack).  It's very  nice; pretty and/or exciting  instrumental music, occasionally  punctuated by deliberately annoying  singing (to wit, the Information Booth  dolls' song, the Merry Men's song, and  of course the ever-popular Exploding  Bluebird Duet).  And I've listened to  the score a couple times, and a bizarre  and yet eerily plausible idea has  developed in my brain:<br />
<br />
Shrek: the ballet.<br />
<br />
Seriously.  I think it could work.   Parody aside, it <i>is</i> a fairy tale, and  those always make good ballets.  The  only read difficulty is that some major  plot moments, such as the big rasslin'  scene, used sountrack songs rather than  score pieces, so those gaps would need  filling. ]]></description>
                <author>~shinyhappygoth</author>
            </item>
          <item>
                <title>Heeeeee...</title>
                <link>http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/journal/2995055/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/journal/2995055/</guid>
                <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:15:44 PDT</pubDate>
                
                <description><![CDATA[ This makes me happy.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.improb.com/airchives/paperair/volume6/v6i4/postal-6-4.html">[link]</a> ]]></description>
                <author>~shinyhappygoth</author>
            </item>
          <item>
                <title>a dire warning</title>
                <link>http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/journal/2798201/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/journal/2798201/</guid>
                <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2004 22:41:21 PDT</pubDate>
                
                <description><![CDATA[ A well-meaning friend tried to tell me  the plot (condensed, trailer-style) to  Shrek 3 tonight.  I fortunately managed  to avoid seeing more than about six  words of it, and even those keep  niggling at me and I probably won't be  able to forget them without a lobotomy,  but I'm going to bloody well try.  I  have actually started crying a little  bit, rather to my surprise, because I  normally only <i>ever</i> cry due to  menstrually-induced hormonal imbalance.<br />
Let it be known right now:<br />
<br />
<b>I LOATHE SPOILERS.</b><br />
<br />
I <i>want</i> to be surprised.  I went into  Shrek 2 the first time not having seen  any trailers, read any reviews, or even  looked at the bloody posters, and I  came out feeling <i>incredibly</i> glad that  this was the case.  If you spoil 3 for  me, <i>any</i> of it, you had better buy me  off with action figures, because I <i>will</i>  hunt you down. ]]></description>
                <author>~shinyhappygoth</author>
            </item>
          <item>
                <title>current thoughts on Shrek</title>
                <link>http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/journal/2725425/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">http://shinyhappygoth.deviantart.com/journal/2725425/</guid>
                <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:12:18 PDT</pubDate>
                
                <description><![CDATA[ We need a new word meaning "humans who  aren't ogres," because ogres <i>are</i>  clearly a type of human.  The major  differences are size, skin colour (and  that <i>is</i> pigmentation, not  differently-coloured blood; they have  pink lips and gums), shape of ears, and  a certain gastronomic intensity.  The  overall difference is no greater than  that between a doberman and a  schnauzer.  If ogres aren't simply a  human subspecies, then this is the most  amazing case of convergent evolution  I've ever seen.<br />
(Yes, I know science has no place in a  discussion of Shrek.  That doesn't make  it any less true, though.) ]]></description>
                <author>~shinyhappygoth</author>
            </item>
    </channel>
</rss>